Milk powder is something that every baby must eat, and it is very necessary to ensure food safety. Many businesses now make unlucky money and sell unruly milk powder, which has an adverse effect on the health and development of the baby. Let the following list 123 net announce the list of 2016 problem milk powder for you, stop buying these problem milk powder.
First, the list of the first batch of 2016 problem milk powder
According to the official website of the State Food and Drug Administration, from October to December 2015, the State Food and Drug Administration carried out a special national supervision and inspection on infant formula milk powder. A total of 274 samples were sampled and 6 unqualified samples were detected.
Samples that do not meet national food safety standards, food safety risks, nominal production company names, food names, specifications, and model trademarks do not meet national standards:
1.Shaanxi Jinniu Dairy Co., Ltd.
Kimbe Metto Gold Baby Formula Goat Milk Powder (1) 900g / can Kimbe Metto E. sakazakii
2.Shaanxi Yatai Dairy Co., Ltd.
Gold Premium Baby Formula Goat Milk Powder (1) 800g / can
3. Ningxia Hongguo Dairy Industry Co., Ltd.
Gold Sanneng Infant Formula 900g / Listen to Evergrande
Enterobacter sakazakii, vitamin C
Enterobacter sakazakii was detected in all three batches. Enterobacter sakazakii is a pathogenic bacterium that exists in the environment and poses a high health risk to babies aged 0 to 6 months, especially premature, low-weight and immune-deficient infants.
According to national food safety standards, Enterobacter sakazakii cannot be detected in infant formula. Enterobacter sakazakii exceeded the standard mainly due to the company’s failure to strictly control the environment of the production and processing process and the sanitary conditions of equipment and facilities.
The vitamin C of Ningxia red fruit unqualified samples is lower than the national standard value and lower than the value stated on the label.
Various types of nutritional content indicators in infant formula milk powder are formulated based on the nutritional requirements of infants and young children in China. Long-term consumption of infant formula milk powder that does not meet national food safety standards may affect infants There is an adverse effect on the growth and development of young children.
Samples that do not meet the product package label’s explicit value, food safety risks, nominal production company name, food name specifications and model trademarks do not meet the product package label’s explicit value:
1. Ningxia Hongguo Dairy Industry Co., Ltd.
Sanneng Quanyou OPO Older Infant Formula 900g / Hengda Sodium
2. Dunhua Meilijian Dairy Co., Ltd.
Older infant formula (2 steps) 900 g / can of Yiyi Taurine
3.Shaanxi Hongxing Meiling Dairy Co., Ltd.
Duo Yang Hui Yang Yue Infant Formula Goat Milk Powder (Section 1) 800g / can of Antelope Pantothenic Acid
For the above-mentioned production enterprises that detected unqualified samples, the State Food and Drug Administration informed the Shaanxi, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, and Jilin Province food and drug regulatory authorities as soon as possible in accordance with the provisions of the “Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” and ordered production enterprises Take measures to stop sales and recall substandard products in a timely manner, thoroughly investigate the cause of the problem, comprehensively rectify it, and investigate and deal with related enterprises according to law.
2. The 2nd batch of 2016 problem milk powder list
Time: March 17
In February 2016, the State Food and Drug Administration organized a random inspection of 194 batches of infant formula milk powder, 192 batches of samples qualified for sampling inspection items, 2 batches of samples that did not meet the sample, involving 2 companies, a love of Shaanxi Red Flag Dairy Xindu Youzhi Infant Formula Goat Milk Powder and Jiabili (Hunan) Foods A Jiabili Super Youdun Infant Formula is on the black list.
The list shows that 2 batches of samples that do not meet national food safety standards and have food safety risks are:
E. sakazakii, which is not allowed to be detected by national food safety standards, was detected in Youzhi infant formula goat milk powder (Section 1) produced by Shaanxi Hongqi Dairy Technology Co., Ltd .;
The detection value of chlorine in Super Youdun infant formula produced by Jiabili (Hunan) Food Co., Ltd. is 9mg / 100kJ, and the national food safety standard is 12-38mg / 100kJ, which is 3mg / 100kJ lower than the lower limit of the national food safety standard. .
For the unqualified products found in the above sampling inspections, the food and drug regulatory authorities of Shaanxi and Hunan provinces have ordered production enterprises to take measures to stop production, sales, and recall of unqualified products, thoroughly investigate the cause of the problem, comprehensively rectify the problem, and carry out relevant measures for relevant enterprises Investigate and handle; require the business unit to take measures such as delisting and storage to prevent and control risks.
Third, 7 batches of imported milk powder such as Tefalfin, Holle, Angelland are unqualified
Time: May 14
It is understood that Heilongjiang Food and Drug Administration notified 7 batches of unqualified imported organic milk powder. Among them, there are four Lactana Tefalfen organic infant milk powders, which are represented by the Chinese general agent Beijing Baihui Zhiye Technology Co., Ltd.
The specific batches are:
Specifications and models are 600g (2 bags) / box, Tefalban organic infant formula 1 produced on 2014/12/30;
Specification model is 600g (2 bags) / box, Tefalban organic infant formula 1 produced on 2015/1/28;
The specification model is 600g (2 bags) / box, and the production date of Tefal organic infant formula 3 is 2015/3/1;
The specification model is 600g (2 bags) / box, and the production date of Tefalfen Organic Older Infant and Toddler Formula 2 on June 18, 2014.
The four milk powder unqualified items were detected as docosahexaenoic acid and icosatetraenoic acid did not meet the label value.
At the same time, Angelland was suspended from registration in China, and appeared on the list of disqualifications announced on May 12.
The one-agent Angi’sLand Organic Infant Formula, a 500g / box produced by the general distributor Beijing Hengyuankang Technology Co., Ltd., with a production date of 2014/5/26, was unqualified. The failing item was vitamin A.
The unqualified Holle that was detected in the same batch has been registered on May 16th by the CNCA website for its manufacturer AgranaSt · rkeGmbH.
Fourth, the 630 cans of Meiliyuan goat milk powder that failed the sampling inspection were recalled
When: June 14
Due to the unqualified total number of colonies, Shaanxi Meiliyuan Dairy Co., Ltd. produced a batch of 20160307 Meiliyuan Gold Classic Baby Formula Milk Powder was notified by the Food and Drug Administration of Shaanxi Province on May 20 and recalled nationwide.
On June 14, the goat milk powder was reported again by the State Food and Drug Administration. Suspected production and operation of unqualified food products were confiscated about 42,600 yuan, and fined about 900,000 yuan.
In May 2016, the State Food and Drug Administration sampled 227 batches of infant formula and 2 batches of unqualified samples. One batch of samples that did not meet national food safety standards and had food safety risks. The nominal manufacturers, products and unqualified indicators involved were: Gold Classical Infant Formula Milk Powder (1) produced by Shaanxi Meiliyuan Dairy Co., Ltd. The test results of the total number of 5 colonies were 1500CFU / g, 2200CFU / g, 4400CFU / g, 1300CFU / g, and 1500CFU / g. The five test results that did not meet the national food safety standards were less than or equal to 10,000CFU / g and at least 3 test results are less than or equal to 1000CFU / g requirements.
Five, Yabei (Shenzhen) Dairy Co., Ltd. milk powder is not qualified
When: July 19
On July 19, 2016, the unqualified food in the General Administration’s Circular No. 108 of 2016 related to infant formula (Section 1, batch number 160117IQG01) produced by Guangdong Yabei (Shenzhen) Dairy Co., Ltd. vitamin A, vitamin D , Vitamin K1, vitamin B1, vitamin B6, nicotinic acid (nicotinamide), folic acid, pantothenic acid, iodine, selenium and other 10 indicators do not meet national food safety standards, and 1 indicator (taurine) does not meet the product package label’s stated value Claim.
Guangdong Food and Drug Administration, after receiving the notification of the initial inspection failure on June 2, 2016, has ordered the Shenzhen Food and Drug Administration to order Yabei (Shenzhen) Dairy Co., Ltd. in June 2016. On the 4th, production was completely rectified, and suspected products were recalled. As of now, 1,208 cans of substandard batches of products shipped have been recalled. 1,850 cans of this batch of products have been sold and cannot be recalled. The Bureau has seized and seized the recalled products and disposed of them according to law.
6. Linxia Liaoyuan Dairy Milk Powder is not qualified
Time: August 23
On August 23, the official website of the State Food and Drug Administration announced that the batch No. 20160319254P (L) of infant formula milk (Section 2) produced by Linxia Daiyuan Dairy Co., Ltd. in Gansu Province did not meet the requirements of the product packaging label. Value was recalled.
The data shows that on July 18, the State Food and Drug Administration issued the “Notice of the General Administration on the Failure of 2 Batches of Infant Formula Milk Powder in June 2016” (2016 No. 108), which involved Linxia Liaoyuan Dairy in Gansu The batch No. 20160319254P (L) produced by Co., Ltd. has a vitamin B1 test value that meets national food safety standards but does not meet the stated value on the product packaging label.
After receiving the notification of non-conformity, the Linxia Prefecture Food and Drug Administration of Gansu Province immediately investigated the company and ordered the company to remove the product, recall the product in question, and destroy it. At present, after careful investigation of potential risks, enterprises have made rectifications and targeted implementation, and rectifications have been put in place.
The reporter checked the information and found that the milk powder of Linxia Liaoyuan Dairy Company of Gansu Province had been “named” due to quality problems in the first half of this year.
In January 2016, the State Food and Drug Administration carried out a special national supervision and inspection of infant formula milk powder. Jinzun infant formula milk powder (Section 1) produced by Linxiazhou Liaoyuan Dairy Co., Ltd., Gansu Province, detected that National food safety standards.
7. The Food and Drug Administration announced in August the list of July 2 batches of unqualified infant milk powder
Time: Sampling in July, announced in August
At the end of August, the State Food and Drug Administration announced the results of the July 2016 inspection of infant formula milk powder. In this sampling, 226 batches of infant formula milk powder were sampled, 224 batches of samples passed the sampling inspection, and 2 batches of unqualified samples, accounting for 0.9%. Among them, 1 batch of samples that do not meet national food safety standards and have food safety risks; 1 batch of samples that meet national food safety standards but do not meet the stated value of the product packaging label.
According to the official website of the State Food and Drug Administration, one batch of samples that do not meet the national food safety standards and have food safety risks. The nominal production enterprises, products and unqualified indicators involved are:
The detection value of the total number of colonies in the Golden Noble infant formula (3 stages of fresh care) produced by Huainan Yiyi Nutrition Food Technology Co., Ltd. is 6500, 2000, 6200, 6800, and 2200 CFU / g. Requirements of less than or equal to 10,000 CFU / g and at least 3 test results are less than or equal to 1000 CFU / g.
The 1 batch of samples that meet the national food safety standards but do not meet the stated value of the product packaging label, the nominal production enterprises, products and non-conformance indicators involved are:
The detection value of taurine in GOLD Gold infant formula milk powder (Section 2) produced by Huainan Yiyi Nutrition Food Technology Co., Ltd. is 0.51mg / 100kJ, the national food safety standard is ≤3mg / 100kJ, and the product packaging label clearly requires It is ≥0.96mg / 100kJ, which is 47% lower than the value indicated on the product packaging label.
How to choose milk powder
Each country has its own safety standards for infant formula, and there are still differences in the content of vitamins, minerals and other indicators. This requires consumers to be careful and cautious when purchasing milk powder at sea.
1.Experts suggest that since different countries have different formula standards, domestic consumers still try to buy domestic milk powder. After all, Chinese standards are formulated based on the physical and nutritional analysis of Chinese mothers and infants, which is the most suitable for Chinese babies. Physically, and China’s infant milk powder companies have advanced in milk sources, equipment, production and processing technology, research teams, etc., consumers can rest assured.
2. If you want to choose foreign brand milk powder, first of all, you can choose foreign milk powder imported from regular channels, because such milk powder is produced in accordance with Chinese standards, and the outer packaging is Chinese, which is easy to read. If you insist on choosing Haitao or foreign purchasing, please try to choose foreign milk powder with formula close to our standard.
3, milk powder is also a consumable, it is recommended that everyone act within their means and try to choose a big brand.